Subscribe | Give a Gift | Subscription Customer Service

Woodworking Magazine Weblog

Posted 1/2/2007 in All Weblog Posts | Workbenches



I had a girlfriend in high school who had two unusual characteristics. Lynette was a drama major (not a recommended trait in girlfriends) and her father owned a sweet-looking MG convertible. Whenever I would go to her house for dinner, her father would be under the hood of the vehicle, wrench in hand, until the fried okra hit the dinner table.

The MG was always in need of something, and Lynette’s dad had to do it himself. This was, after all, Arkansas. And anything that wasn’t built in Detroit elicited stares from the townsfolk.

This week, I’m beginning to get the same feeling about the English-style workbench I’m finishing up in the shop. Except for a detail or two, the bench is built. (The photo above was taken before I added the shelf below the top.) But I’m finding that – like its British four-banger brethren – the bench is a bit needy.

For example, I flattened the top last week, but it’s a bit out of true this week. So I flattened it again. I’m also wondering if the top is stiff enough to withstand heavy planing. The top is 1-1/2” thick and supported by bearers beneath, but it still has an almost imperceptible springy feel that gives me pause. Will it make a difference in my day-to-day work? I don’t know. But I am going to add a couple more ribs on the underside of the top to see if I can stiffen things up.

Perhaps the problem here is that I’m comparing this bench to the Roubo-style French bench I built in 2005. The top to that bench is almost 4” thick and is unyielding to all punishment. But that bench took twice as long to build and required three times the material.

Clearly, I need to take the English bench for more of a test drive.

As I’ve begun breaking in the bench by working on it, I have found some things about it that are quite nice. The angled leg vise is fantastic. The large front apron is an excellent means of supporting long and wide work with little effort. And I’ve actually been clamping stuff to the benchtop without too much trouble at its ends.

Bottom line: I go through this process with all projects. I start with great optimism as I begin a project. After a series of highs and lows, I complete the project. I stand back, take a look and focus on its flaws, the project’s frustrations and my mistakes. Then, after I put the project into use, I mellow. The flaws fade and I’m able to see the project for what it is – somewhere between the optimism and the despair.

I hope this is also true with the bench. It sure didn’t happen with Lynette (or her dad’s MG). He sold the green convertible and Lynette dumped me for one of the officers of the drama club.

— Christopher Schwarz

Tuesday, January 02, 2007 8:57:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
That angled vise is tres cool

Happy New Year!
Wednesday, January 03, 2007 3:09:57 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
It certainly has a certain charm about it. Like Joel said, the angled vise is pretty cool. I like the void between the angled legs. The angled legs also seem they would add a certain resistence to movement given the light weight. As well, I often end up standing directly against the bench for certain things and the clear span seems nice. Well, speaking of the void under the bench, seems clean up would be great.

Looking forward to your thoughts in a few months...Take care, Mike
Mike Wenzloff
Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:41:44 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Chris,

Do you think that the springiness might be a result of using pine rather than maple or beech? I would think a 1-1/2" thick top in maple with battens underneath would feel rock solid.

-Jamey
Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:48:21 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)

Jamey,

This morning I went in and pounded pretty hard on the top in the center. It seemed quite stout. More so than I thought at the end of the day yesterday.

Certainly maple would be fantastic. But yellow pine is actually slightly stiffer, according to the numbers in Bruce Hoadley's book "Understanding Wood."

The Stiffness of Common Woods

Species E value
Hemlock, eastern 1.20
Chestnut 1.23
White pine 1.24
Sycamore 1.42
Basswood 1.46
American cherry 1.49
Hemlock, western 1.49
Red oak (Northern) 1.49
Poplar 1.58
European beech 1.63
Red (soft) maple 1.64
Black walnut 1.68
American beech 1.72
Ash 1.77
White oak 1.78
Hard maple 1.83
Southern yellow pine 1.93
Douglas fir 1.95
Yellow birch 2.01
Hickory, shagbark 2.16

Christopher Schwarz
Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:54:43 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Ah hah! But let me counter your argument here for argument's sake. I would venture to guess that despite the *stiffness*, the pine could still feel springier if you were detecting the softness of the wood. The board as a whole might be stiff, but the surface may have some give. Of course, that takes the subject of battens out of the way.

Anyway, glad that your view of the bench continues to mellow. I personally really like this design and have considered something similar. I have a few nice 8/4 and 12/4 hard maple boards in my wood rack that have been stewing for a couple of years waiting for bench 2.0. :) This design is similar to one I have had in mind. I am still using my current bench to determine whether I really need that tail vise or not. You can see my current bench on my homepage (click on my name, I think to get there).

-Jamey
Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:57:59 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Jamey,

You might be correct. It might be the softness of the wood that's a fooler here. It probably is stiff enough, all-in-all, but I'll probably shore it up anyway. After building a Roubo bench, I'm a fan of overkill.
Christopher Schwarz
Wednesday, January 03, 2007 12:47:12 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I'm watching your commentary on this one quite carefully: I'm planning to build a bench this year or next and have wondered about torsion boxes instead of slabs. Also, could you post a picture of the hinge at the bottom of that leg vise?

Thanks!
Wednesday, January 03, 2007 6:25:59 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Very nice bench, Chris. When can we expect some more build notes and possibly an eDrawings blow out?

Thanks for sharing.

Karl
Comments are closed.
 Copyright © 2005 F+W Publications Inc. All rights reserved.